Hey ed- body.  Back once again – it’s the INCREDIBLE “D”.   Naaw, for real.  How are ya’ll doin.  I’m well; I am well.  For the next few days I am going to make an effort to discuss the different technological ideologies of the running candidates.  Keep in mind that I have a counterpart that will be doing his own things on various Tech issues but mine, at least for a bit, will be on the technology stances touted by our two completely different candidates. As I have mentioned in the past; I won’t discuss who I am voting for but I will call a spade a spade.  If I think the idea is great, I will say so; if the idea is not so great I will make fun of it but isn’t that one of the beauties of a blog; you can take the political correctness right outta the politics.

Let’s start with McCain, today and his Technology stance.  Like President Bush, Mr. McCain believes heavily in a global market place. He says that “markets work best when there is robust competition” and believes that, as with other goods, the economy of technology should be consumer driven with minimal government regulation.  Mr. McCain (I feel like I have to call him “Mr. McCain” because he’s so old – sorry) justifies his stance by saying that “any new device will cost less because of more competition” consequently, the larger the competing arena the lower the price will be.

What about his ideas on the internet?  Well Mr. McCain believes that all individuals should have access to high-speed internet and the educational and economic opportunities provided by it, so as president he says he will encourage private companies to invest in the infrastructure that will help make this belief a reality.  I think that even Mr. McCain knows that private industry can and does fail at times (as all man made things tend to do) which is why he states that in the case where private industry can not meet the demands or needs of a market, local government can step in to help create infrastructure that will.

My three cents

So what do you think?  Personally – for the most part; I like this part of the plan but I am torn between the whole “Global Competition”.  On one hand GC will allow for lower prices and quicker technological advancement but at what cost - there is always a cost.  Will it be at the price of quality or jobs?  I think that those are valid questions when you take into consideration the problems we have been having with goods from other countries not to mention rising unemployment levels.  In January national unemployment levels were around 4.7% NOW they hover around 5.5%.  I can’t help but wonder if a little less globalization and a little more domestic investment in jobs might help us all out a little more in the long run. But I’m not an economist, just an opinion head and that’s my opinion.

I do like his ideas on the internet.  I am all for doing whatever it takes to make this technology available to all.  I like his contingency supplement; the idea that encourages local government to step in when private industry fails or when they (private industry)  think that they have picked all the low hanging fruit.  I think that it will take a balanced and concerted effort from both sides to make this goal a reality and again, I am all for an effort that can bring this dream to fruition.